ZIP 75226 has 34.5% higher typical home value than ZIP 75203. ZIP 75226 has 0.7% higher typical rent than ZIP 75203.
Key stats
- ZIP 75226 has 34.5% higher typical home value than ZIP 75203.
- ZIP 75226 has 0.7% higher typical rent than ZIP 75203.
- ZIP 75203 has 590.9% higher for-sale inventory than ZIP 75226.
- ZIP 75226 has 26.9% higher buyer competition than ZIP 75203.
- The home-value-to-annual-rent ratio ranges from 10.8 in ZIP 75203 to 16.4 in ZIP 75226.
- typical home value delta
- ZIP 75226 has 34.5% higher typical home value than ZIP 75203.
- typical rent delta
- ZIP 75226 has 0.7% higher typical rent than ZIP 75203.
- homes for sale delta
- ZIP 75203 has 590.9% higher for-sale inventory than ZIP 75226.
- buyer competition delta
- ZIP 75226 has 26.9% higher buyer competition than ZIP 75203.
The largest measurable differences
ZIP 75226 has 34.5% higher typical home value than ZIP 75203. ZIP 75226 has 0.7% higher typical rent than ZIP 75203. ZIP 75203 has 590.9% higher for-sale inventory than ZIP 75226.
Price and rent differences
ZIP 75226 has 34.5% higher typical home value than ZIP 75203. ZIP 75226 has 0.7% higher typical rent than ZIP 75203.
The home-value-to-annual-rent ratio ranges from 10.8 in ZIP 75203 to 16.4 in ZIP 75226.
Supply and buyer pressure
ZIP 75203 has 590.9% higher for-sale inventory than ZIP 75226. ZIP 75226 has 26.9% higher buyer competition than ZIP 75203.
Continue your market research
- ZIP 75203 housing marketCurrent home value, rent, inventory, and competition for this ZIP.
- ZIP 75226 housing marketCurrent home value, rent, inventory, and competition for this ZIP.
- Dallas housing marketSee the complete metro ZIP directory.
- Is Dallas a buyer's market?Review metro-wide leverage signals.
Sources and method
- HomeMarketCap.com data sources: ZIP-level home value, rent, inventory, and market activity data
- HomeMarketCap.com methodology: metric definitions and missing-data rules
Figures are updated monthly by the HomeMarketCap.com team under our editorial policy. Spotted something wrong? Report a correction.